<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Long Live Feedlounge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tanctop.co.uk/2006/01/18/long-live-feedlounge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tanctop.co.uk/2006/01/18/long-live-feedlounge/</link>
	<description>The Return!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 21:40:23 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://tanctop.co.uk/2006/01/18/long-live-feedlounge/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2006 10:52:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tanctop.co.uk/2006/01/18/long-live-feedlounge/#comment-9</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s hyperbole ;-) I understand that some people don&#039;t want to pay on &quot;ongoing fee for a web-based service&quot; but in my experience if you don&#039;t pay you often end up with unreliable or filled with advertising services. I pay for webhosting for instance.

A desktop alternative would obviously be far superior performance and reliability wise, but I do my feedreading at work and I don&#039;t have that option, plus the obvious problems of synchronisation of unread items. In my Feedlounge today I have 1847 unread items I don&#039;t want to have to work out what I have and haven&#039;t read when I switch PC&#039;s.

I can&#039;t say I really understand when people have on objection to paying for any services online.  I&#039;m not one to throw money around at webservices. I haven&#039;t got a flickr pro account etc. etc. Bandwidth costs money, servers cost money, people&#039;s time costs money.

How do you get your domain name for your blog? Unless someone else payed for it, or it&#039;s being subsidised in some other way, I&#039;m guessing you&#039;re paying an ongoing fee for a web-based service. 

In the end it comes down to value rather than cost. If you won&#039;t pay for anything you end up with hosting at geocities with a matching url. 

Feedlounge provides an innovative service and because it&#039;s a two man startup is flexible enough to respond fairly instantly to problems, suggestions etc. This isn&#039;t a religious issue. If bloglines moves forward, I haven&#039;t deleted my account, I can stop the FL payments at any time. If http://www.bloxor.com/ matures rapidly that could replace both of them. 

Thanks for stopping by! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s hyperbole <img src='http://tanctop.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  I understand that some people don&#8217;t want to pay on &#8220;ongoing fee for a web-based service&#8221; but in my experience if you don&#8217;t pay you often end up with unreliable or filled with advertising services. I pay for webhosting for instance.</p>
<p>A desktop alternative would obviously be far superior performance and reliability wise, but I do my feedreading at work and I don&#8217;t have that option, plus the obvious problems of synchronisation of unread items. In my Feedlounge today I have 1847 unread items I don&#8217;t want to have to work out what I have and haven&#8217;t read when I switch PC&#8217;s.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t say I really understand when people have on objection to paying for any services online.  I&#8217;m not one to throw money around at webservices. I haven&#8217;t got a flickr pro account etc. etc. Bandwidth costs money, servers cost money, people&#8217;s time costs money.</p>
<p>How do you get your domain name for your blog? Unless someone else payed for it, or it&#8217;s being subsidised in some other way, I&#8217;m guessing you&#8217;re paying an ongoing fee for a web-based service. </p>
<p>In the end it comes down to value rather than cost. If you won&#8217;t pay for anything you end up with hosting at geocities with a matching url. </p>
<p>Feedlounge provides an innovative service and because it&#8217;s a two man startup is flexible enough to respond fairly instantly to problems, suggestions etc. This isn&#8217;t a religious issue. If bloglines moves forward, I haven&#8217;t deleted my account, I can stop the FL payments at any time. If <a href="http://www.bloxor.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.bloxor.com/</a> matures rapidly that could replace both of them. </p>
<p>Thanks for stopping by! <img src='http://tanctop.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Merrett</title>
		<link>http://tanctop.co.uk/2006/01/18/long-live-feedlounge/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Merrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2006 21:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tanctop.co.uk/2006/01/18/long-live-feedlounge/#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Bloglines is dead? Hmm - good luck with your $5 p/m service. BL works for me just fine and I&#039;ve a host of free desktop alternatives if it ever dies. Sure, I know not everything can be free, but I would think very carefully before paying an ongoing fee for a web-based service. But that&#039;s just me :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bloglines is dead? Hmm &#8211; good luck with your $5 p/m service. BL works for me just fine and I&#8217;ve a host of free desktop alternatives if it ever dies. Sure, I know not everything can be free, but I would think very carefully before paying an ongoing fee for a web-based service. But that&#8217;s just me <img src='http://tanctop.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
